Asian Tax Journal

Print ISSN 1738-3323 Online ISSN 2733-9270

Research on K-IFRS and Tax Law Issues in Construction Contracts

  • BYUNG WOOK JUN University of Seoul
  • Boram Choi University of Seoul

Asian Tax Journal Vol. 12 No. 3 (2011), pp. 81-104

Abstract

As the Korean International Financial Reporting Standards (“K-IFRS” hereafter) are enacted,accounting ambiguity and inconsistence between K-IFRS and tax laws are expected to keep growing, especially in construction contracts. Accounting problems of K-IFRS in construction contracts, which this study analyzes, are as below. First, percentage-of-completion method, which is much fit for most construction contracts than completed-contract method, is hardly accepted in K-IFRS and, as a result, the reliability of financial reporting with percentage-of-completion method could be lowered. Second, though legal entity in most project finance development is developer, construction company should take accounting responsibilities of the development as substantial business entity. Third, though completed-contract method is much fit for sales from rebuilding construction,that accounting method hardly meets the requirements of K-IFRS. Tax law issues in construction contracts, which is related with those accounting issues, are as below. First, accounting principles should be revised to lessen the inconsistence between K-IFRS and tax laws in short-term construction contracts of small and mid-sized companies, which is expected to keep growing. Second, tax laws should be revised to lessen the difference between K-IFRS and tax laws in application of percentage-of-completion method. Third, taxpayers should be allowed to adopt K-IFRS, instead of tax laws, in case the “percentage of completion” is unable to be rationally measured, loss from completed contract is expected, or residential housing is sold before completion.

Keywords

  • Construction Contracts
  • Korean International Financial Reporting Standards
  • Tax Adjustment

Related Articles